What is happiness to you?
My paper is on
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, which is about happiness and what that
happiness means to each individual because though some may agree happiness is
the result of being well with living well, everyone has their own definition of
what happiness really is. Some find happiness is with virtue, others wealth,
and or pleasure. Just as the definition
differs so does the end to happiness because every action or activity must have
an end. We all aim to complete something whether it is a house, a goal, an
action and or activity.
When reading I was
intrigued how Aristotle compared so many things, that when together made sense
such as, integrity and how that is something found within a person’s moral
virtue, which is found in the soul not the body. He is an interesting
philosopher and when comparing to Plato and Thoreau everything all made
sense. How in Henry David Thoreau’s
Walden he was at his happiest when in complete solitude, and as for Plato’s
Apology his character Socrates was truthful within his moral integrity until
the very end. My favorite line in
Aristotle’s reading is as followed:
“when isolated makes life desirable and lacking in
nothing; and such we think happiness to be; and further we think it most
desirable of all things, without being counted as one good among others” (pg.567).
To have nothing is the greatest happiness of all as a person doesn’t have
distraction, or things, but the things within oneself. That is the greatest of
all goods.
paper:
What is happiness to you?
paper:
What is happiness to you?
Aristotlelian Ethics: Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle (384-322
B.C.) was written by a student of Plato’s who is said to take his own thoughts
and ideas and become one of the greatest philosophers of all time. His works
include Metaphysics, Categories, Physics,
and many others in addition to the Nicomachean
Ethics.
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is about the pursuit of aiming towards something
in order to come to an end. Some aim for happiness, where most can agree
happiness is associated with being well and doing well. Though they can agree
the pursuit is happiness what defines happiness differs from person to person.
Some believe happiness is the pursuit of wealth, pleasure, or honour, but
people differ when it comes to these things such as, with health when he is
ill, and with wealth when he is poor. But with every good there is an end, and
these ends differ depending on the person and their opinion. Some look at good
as happiness ending in an activity or action, while others look at
good/happiness ending in the products apart from the activity or action such as
the feeling a person receives from achieving that something.
Where there is an action or activity there is
goodness, there are three kinds of goods which are divided into three classes
“some described as external, others relating to soul or to body; we call those
that relate to soul most properly and truly goods, and psychical actions and
activities we call as relating to the soul” (pg.568). Human virtue is of the
soul not of the body; and happiness is the activity of the soul. Some identify being happy with virtue, where
being happy is an activity of the soul in harmony to virtue. There are
different kinds of virtues for some virtues are intellectual and others moral,
philosophical wisdom and understanding and practical wisdom being intellectual,
open-mindedness and self-restraint as being moral.
In comparison to Aristotle’s human
virtue of the soul, his teacher Plato’s character Socrates in the Apology, expressed
bravery, integrity of moral virtue of the soul within his own truth. Socrates who
was sentenced to death by the council, who believed he was offending them by
teaching the young about asking questions, and allowing them to be open-minded.
Socrates despite knowing his fate would potentially lead him to death did not
fear it, nor did he tell the council what they wanted to hear in order to be
found not guilty. He believed his moral truth, his integrity was more important
and worth- while than living knowing he betrayed himself. He wanted to die
knowing he was a good man with good values, who did good things for others and
lived a happy life.
In
addition to Plato’s comparison, Henry David Thoreau’s Walden Where I lived, and
what I lived for, was about Thoreau himself searching for happiness in a house.
He found the house that brought him true happiness in Walden Pond, after having
lived at different places for a short period of time. It was isolated and
secluded where he was in the midst of nature, and was alone with his thoughts
and ideas. This relates to Aristotle’s self-sufficient definition of happiness
“when isolated makes life desirable and lacking in nothing; and such we think
happiness to be; and further we think it most desirable of all things, without
being counted as one good among others” (pg.567). Being self-sufficient is the
end to an action and happiness is something final.
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics on
knowledge demonstrates that a man who has received an all- around education is
a good and knowledgeable man, but a young man who has not finished his
education is inexperienced and uninformed in the actions of life. The end
result to the man with an education is knowledge which is profitable, but the
young man who would rather follow his passions, his study will be in vain and
unprofitable because the end result will not be knowledge. Every action or
activity as previously mentioned aims at some good so though the young man’s
end result will not be knowledge, he will still gain principle knowledge for
his actions which will be beneficial.
Plato’s Apology shows Socrates being
condemned for teaching knowledge to others in a different way that appears
bothersome to the council before him. He is teaching his young students to be
open-minded and to ask questions to subjects that may need answers in order to
broaden their education and mind. To ask questions, a person is widening their
horizons, which should be a good thing, but he is found guilty and sentenced to
death for it. His young students
according to Aristotle will not be knowledgeable in terms of profit and
experience, but they will be knowledgeable in terms of principle in the sense
they will have gained insight into other worldly actions, such as the world
around them and to not be afraid to ask questions. As Aristotle has explained
for every action there is goodness and where there is goodness there is
happiness.
I am in
agreement with Aristotle that happiness is different to everyone. A person can
be fulfilled doing both an action and an activity. Happiness is virtuous as it
is pleasurable and self-sufficient. Happiness is the end result to something,
as I yearn to achieve something good from an activity. When helping others by
bringing joy and goodness, that to me is happiness in the sense I have achieved
something good. Moral virtue is something I can relate to as I always try to
have an open-mind and enhance my education. Happiness is whatever a person
makes of it and the end result they gain from whatever activity or action they
are doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment